Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social & Legal Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harding, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

‘Dogs Are "Registered", People Shouldn’t Be’: Legal Consciousness and Lesbian and Gay Rights

Rosie Harding

University of Kent, UK

In this article I examine lesbians’ and gay men’s attitudes towards the legal recognition of same-sex relationships, using the theoretical framework of legal consciousness. I first provide a brief overview of the legal consciousness literature, before outlining some of the critiques of legal consciousness. Lesbian and gay legal consciousness is then examined through an analysis of qualitative responses to a large-scale online study of perceptions of and attitudes towards same-sex marriage and the legal recognition or regulation of same-sex relationships. Responses are analysed using thematic analysis to elaborate on five main themes within these data: formal equality, the relationship between legal and social change, the naming of legally recognized same-sex relationships, human rights discourse and citizenship claims. I argue that legal consciousness studies can help to interrogate the pervasiveness of discourses around formal equality and discrimination in the ways in which lesbians and gay men think about, use and position themselves in relation to law.

Key Words: citizenship • equality • human rights • legal consciousness • lesbian and gay rights • same-sex marriage

Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 15, No. 4, 511-533 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0964663906069545
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Social Legal StudiesHome page
M. Hertogh
What's in a Handshake? Legal Equality and Legal Consciousness in the Netherlands
Social Legal Studies, June 1, 2009; 18(2): 221 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Social Legal StudiesHome page
K. Osterlund
Love, Freedom and Governance: Same-Sex Marriage in Canada
Social Legal Studies, March 1, 2009; 18(1): 93 - 109.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 SexualitiesHome page
E. Peel and R. Harding
Editorial Introduction: Recognizing and Celebrating Same-Sex Relationships: Beyond the Normative Debate
Sexualities, December 1, 2008; 11(6): 659 - 666.
[PDF]

Home page
 SexualitiesHome page
R. Harding
Recognizing (and Resisting) Regulation: Attitudes to the Introduction of Civil Partnership
Sexualities, December 1, 2008; 11(6): 740 - 760.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 SexualitiesHome page
C. Smart
'Can I Be Bridesmaid?' Combining the Personal and Political in Same-Sex Weddings
Sexualities, December 1, 2008; 11(6): 761 - 776.
[Abstract] [PDF]