Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social & Legal Studies
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haldar, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Utilitarianism and the Painful Orient

Piyel Haldar

Birkbeck, University of London, UK

The impact of Utilitarian thought on legal and quasi-legal institutions is immense. Its language pervades at the level of agendas, goals, invectives and proscriptions. Yet, little attention is paid to the manner in which Utilitarianism addresses the question of fidelity. The history of Western institutional statecraft is simultaneously a history of the profound fidelity of subjects to institutions. Does Utilitarianism have a discernible theory of subjectivity? This article takes the case of the introduction of Utilitarian reforms in British India in order to illustrate that the question of subjective attachment most useful to modern rational thinking arises in the modes of thought that such progressive thinking sought to exclude. In the case of British India, Utilitarian reforms (driven by temperate pleasures) were forced to rely upon Oriental tropes of politics that were considered illicit, despotic, and excessive. Such a case study alerts us to the manner in which all forms of Utilitarianism remain linked to arcane modes of address.

Key Words: Bentham • British India • Durbar • excess • Fitzjames Stephens • Mill • Orientalism • pleasure • Utilitarianism

References

  • Balfour, Elizabeth Lady (1899) The History of Lord Lytton's Indian Administration 1876—1880. London: Longmans, Green & co.
  • Bentham, Jeremy (1988) An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: Prometheus.
  • Cohn, Bernard (1983) `Representing Authority in Colonial India', in Eric Hobsbawm and Terrence Ranger (eds) The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cohn, Bernard (1996) Colonialism and its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Collingham, Elizabeth (2001) Imperial Bodies; The Physical Experience of the Raj, c1800—1947. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Fitzjames Stephens, Sir James (1872) Liberty, Equality and Fraternity. London: Hatchard.
  • Fitzjames Stephens, Sir James (1883) History of Criminal Laws of England (Vol. 3). London: Macmillan & Co.
  • Haldar, Piyel (2004) `The Jurisprudence of Travel Literature: Despotism, Excess and Common Law', Journal of Law and Society 31(1): 87—112.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Haldar, Piyel (2007) Law, Orientalism and Postcolonialism: The Jurisdiction of the Lotus Eaters. New York: Routledge.
  • Jevons, William Stanley (1888) The Theory of Political Economy. London: Macmillan.
  • Lytton, Edward Viceroy (1877) `Speech on Proclamation Day, 1st January 1872', in James Talboys Wheeler (1877) History of the Imperial Assemblage at Delhi held on 1st January 1877 to Celebrate the Assumption of the Title of Empress of India by her Majesty the Queen Including Historical Sketches of India and her Princes Past and Present. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer.
  • Macauley, Thomas Lord (1957) `Minute of 2 February 1835', in G. Young (ed.) Macauley, Prose and Poetry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Majumdar, R.C. (1963) British Paramountcy and Indian Resistance. Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bharan.
  • Mehta, Uday Singh (1999) Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth Century British Liberal Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Metcalfe, Thomas (1997) Ideologies of the Raj. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mill, J.S. (1836a) `Letter to Lytton Bulwer E', in Eric Stokes (1989) The English Utilitarians and India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Mill, J.S. (1836b) `Considerations on Representative Government', in Eric Stokes (1989) The English Utilitarians and India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Mill, J.S. (1858) `Memorandum of the Improvements in the Administration of India during the Past Thirty Years', in Eric Stokes (1989) The English Utilitarians and India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Parsons, Talcott (1937) Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Posner, Richard (1979) `Utilitarianism, Economics and Legal Theory', Journal of Legal Studies 8(1): 103—40.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Sen, Amartya (1988) On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Sen Amartya (1999a) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sen, Amartya (1999b) `Introduction', in Amartya Sen and Bernard Williams (eds) Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sen, Amartya (2005) The Argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian History, Culture and Identity. London: Allen Lane.
  • Stokes, Eric (1989) The English Utilitarians and India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Valenta, George Anesley Lord (1925) cited in Curzon George Lord British Government in India (Vol. I). London: Cassell & Co.
  • Wallerstein, Immanuel (2004) World Systems Analysis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Wheeler, James Talboys (1877) History of the Imperial Assemblage at Delhi held on 1st January 1877 to Celebrate the Assumption of the Title of Empress of India by her Majesty the Queen Including Historical Sketches of India and her Princes Past and Present. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer.
  • Zizek, Slavoj (1989) The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.

Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 16, No. 4, 573-590 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0964663907082736


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haldar, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?