Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social & Legal Studies
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ballinger, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Masculinity in the Dock: Legal Responses To Male Violence and Female Retaliation in England and Wales, 1900—1965

Anette Ballinger

Keele University, UK

This article contributes to the debates on gender and punishment by providing an analysis of women who were sentenced to death during the first half of the 20th century after having killed their abusive partners, and who were subsequently reprieved. The article argues that the frame of references within existing `leniency versus harshness' debates are inadequate and cannot provide a complete explanation of the issues surrounding gender and punishment. Instead, in order to gain a full understanding of the complexities of these trial outcomes it is necessary to examine the social construction of both femininity and masculinity and the discourses through which these constructions operated in the courtroom. The article thus demonstrates the way in which discourses around femininity and masculinity both played crucial roles in the final outcomes of the trials. In particular, the article emphasizes the processes through which men as well as women were expected to conform to dominant ideologies around gender. As such, failure to adhere to acceptable standards of masculine behaviour could detract from the man's status as victim while blurring the lines between victim and perpetrator with respect to the woman who eventually retaliated against her violent partner. The article concludes that the narrow focus of `leniency versus harshness' debates masks wider issues of the role of punishment in maintaining the dominant gendered, social order.

Key Words: domestic violence • femininity • gender and punishment • masculinity • social order

References

  • Allen, H. (1987) Justice Unbalanced. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Ballinger, A. (1996) `The Guilt of the Innocent and the Innocence of the Guilty: The Cases of Marie Fahmy and Ruth Ellis', pp. 1—28 in A. Myers and S. Wight (eds) No Angels: Women Who Commit Violence. London: Pandora.
  • Ballinger, A. (2000) Dead Woman Walking. Dartmouth: Ashgate.
  • Ballinger, A. (2005) `Reasonable Women Who Kill: Re-interpreting and Re-defining Women's Responses to Domestic Violence in England and Wales 1900—1965', Outlines: Critical Social Studies (7)2: 65—82.
  • Carlen, P. (1983) Women's Imprisonment. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Carlen, P. (1988) Women, Crime and Poverty. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Carlen, P. (2002) `Introduction: Women and Punishment', pp. 3—20 in P. Carlen (ed.) Women and Punishment. Cullompton: Willan.
  • Chan, W. (2001) Women, Murder and Justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Clark, A. (2000) `Domesticity and the Problem of Wifebeating in Nineteenth-Century Britain: Working-Class Culture, Law and Politics', pp. 27—40 in S. D'Cruze (ed.) Everyday Violence in Britain 1850—1950. Harlow: Longman.
  • Collier, R. (1992) `"The Art of Living the Married Life": Representations of Male Heterosexuality', Law and Legal Studies 1(4): 543—63.[CrossRef]
  • Collier, R. (1995a) Masculinity, Law and the Family. London: Routledge.
  • Collier, R. (1995b) `A Father's "Normal" Love?: Masculinities, Criminology and the Family', in R. Dobash and R. Dobash (eds) Gender and Crime. Cardiff: Cardiff University Press.
  • Collier, R. (1998) Masculinities, Crime and Criminology. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Connell, R.W. (1987) Gender & Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Connell, R.W. (1996) `The State, Gender and Sexual Politics: Theory and Appraisal', pp. 136—73 in H. L. Radtke and H. J. Stam (eds) Power/Gender: Social Relations in Theory and Practice. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Daily Mail 18 March 1949.
  • Edeley, N. and M. Wetherell (1996) `Masculinity, Power and Identity', pp. 97—113 in M. Mac an Ghaill (ed.) Understanding Masculinities. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Edwards, S. (1996) Sex and Gender in the Legal Process. London: Blackstone Press.
  • Fox, M. ( 1995) `Legal Responses to Battered Women Who Kill', pp. 171—200 in J. Bridgeman and S. Mills. (eds) Law and Body Politics. Dartmouth: Ashgate.
  • Frost, G. (2004) `"She is But a Woman": Kitty Byron and the English Edwardian Criminal Justice System', Gender & History 16(3): 538—60.[CrossRef]
  • Garland, D. (1990) Punishment and Modern Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Godfrey, B., S. Farrall, and S. Karstedt (2005) `Explaining Gendered Sentencing Patterns for Violent Men and Women in the Late-Victorian and Edwardian Period', British Journal of Criminology 45: 696—720.[Abstract]
  • Guardian 22 October 2002, 3 March 2004, 14 July 2005, 29 November 2005.
  • Hay, D. ( 1977) `Property, Authority and the Criminal Law', pp. 17—63 in D. Hay, P. Linebaugh, J. Rule, E. P. Thompson and C. Winslow Albion's Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth Century England. Harmondsworth: Peregrine.
  • Haywood, C. and M. Mac an Ghaill (1996) `Schooling Masculinities ', pp. 50—60 in M. Mac an Ghaill (ed.) Understanding Masculinities. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Hearn, J. (1996) `Is Masculinity Dead? A Critique of the Concept of Masculinity/ Masculinities', pp. 202—17 in M. Mac an Ghaill (ed.) Understanding Masculinities. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Heidensohn, F. (1986) Women & Crime. London: Macmillan.
  • King, P. (1984) `Decision-Makers and Decision-Making in the English Criminal Law, 1750—1800', The Historical Journal 27(1): 25—58.
  • Klein, D. (1973) `The Etology of Female Crime', pp. 161—86 in J. Muncie, E. McLaughlin and M. Langan (eds) ( 1996) Criminological Perspectives. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Morrissey, B. (2003) When Women Kill. London: Routledge.
  • Naffine, N. (1990) Law & the Sexes. London: Allen and Unwin.
  • News of the World 12 April 1925.
  • North Mail and Newcastle Chronicle 3 and 9 March 1925.
  • Segal, L. (1990) Slow Motion. London: Virago.
  • Smart, C. (1978) Women, Crime and Criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Smart, C. (1995) Law, Crime and Sexuality. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Smart, C. and B. Smart (eds) (1978) Women, Sexuality and Social Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Strange, C. (2003) `Masculinities, Intimate Femicide and the Death Penalty in Australia 1890—1920', British Journal of Criminology 48: 310—39.
  • The Times, 7 April 1925.
  • Wilcott, S. and Griffin, C. (1996) `Men, Masculinity and the Challenge of Long-term Unemployment', pp. 77—92 in M. Mac an Ghaill (ed.) Understanding Masculinities. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Worrall, A. (1981) `Out of Place: Female Offenders in Court', Probation Journal 28: 90—3.
  • Worrall, A. (1990) Offending Women. London: Routledge.

Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 16, No. 4, 459-481 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0964663907082731


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crime Media CultureHome page
L. Seal
Issues of gender and class in the Mirror newspapers' campaign for the release of Edith Chubb
Crime Media Culture, April 1, 2009; 5(1): 57 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ballinger, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?