Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social & Legal Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carlsson, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hoff, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Dealing with Insolvency and Indebted Individuals in Respect to Law and Morality

Bo Carlsson

University of Lund, Sweden

David Hoff

University of Lund, Sweden

This article is focused on the social and moral problems of insolvency and indebtedness, presenting and analysing the legal structure of the Swedish Act (1994) of Reconstruction of Insolvency. The analysis is related to a revitalisation of Durkheim’s sociology on the forms of social solidarity and, thereby, to the search for moral bonds in our modern and rationalised society. Thus, the analysis will focus on the importance of the sacred symbolism of making efforts and presenting good will. By connecting the insolvency law to a Durkheimian analysis of social solidarity, the article presents functionality and morality as different forces that emphasise the ‘sacred symbolism of punishment’, in order to both strengthen ‘work ethics’ and make legitimate the principle of social welfare and the ‘security net’. According to the analysis, an individual must trustworthily deserve, in a moral sense, the legal opportunity of clearing his or her debts. The clearing of the debt must be pointed out as fair and proved, through the quality of effort and sacrifice.

Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, 293-317 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/096466390000900206


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?