Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social & Legal Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Enigma of Free Speech: Speakers’ Corner, The Geography of Governance and a Crisis of Rationality

John Michael Roberts

Cardiff University, Wales, UK

Officially sanctioned in 1872 by the Royal Parks and Gardens Regulation Act, Speakers’ Corner in Hyde Park, London is often seen as a potent symbol for free speech in Britain. Yet this image is highly problematic. Nowhere in the original 1872 Act does the term ‘free speech’ appear. In this article it is argued that this enigma is in fact perfectly understandable for two reasons. First, the sign ‘speech’ had carved out a distinct geographical and moral space in Hyde Park over a century before 1872. Constituted through the ‘last dying speeches’ of the criminal class of 18th-century London, this subaltern rationality rendered visible the class character of law by disrupting the distancing of legal discourse from governance. Secondly, by undertaking a genealogical investigation of the sign ‘speech’ at Hyde Park, the traces left by scaffold culture were re-combined to slowly translate ‘last dying speeches’ into a more overtly political proletarian public sphere. The political mediation of the sign ‘speech’ meant that the state had to respond to this sign by overcoming the failures of Tyburn and impose a successful mode of governance at Hyde Park. The 1872 Royal Parks and Gardens Regulation Act was an attempt by the state to accomplish this task.

Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, 271-292 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/096466390000900205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?