Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social & Legal Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Lint, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Autonomy, Regulation and the Police Beat

Willem De Lint

University of Windsor, Canada

In this article, the historical development of the police beat in the context of liberal governance is explored. As a mechanism of surveillance, the beat was a continuation of rules of the nightly watch, characterized by a tight control over watchmen by fixing person, post and time. As a site of police autonomy, the patrol beat facilitated the furtherance of the enterprise of the amateur constabulary and cultivated police officer dominion by matching police authority to territorial imperatives. In this way, discipline and autonomy have been carved into the mobilization of police in an economy or surveillance and discretion. The legacy of night and day patrol offered an initial temporal organization to this economy, with prohibitions and permissions by time and place. Rather than compromising liberal distinctions, this patrol bifurcation allowed their perseverance by structuring police capacity to intervene into the lives of citizens. But while the legacy of liberal autonomy in the police beat has served to maintain police discretion in the short run, technological innovations offering enhanced time and space compression may in the long run threaten that autonomy and, with it, an important grounding of liberal consent policing.

Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1, 55-83 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/096466390000900104


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Social Legal StudiesHome page
R. Lippert
Policing Property and Moral Risk Through Promotions, Anonymization and Rewards: Crime Stoppers Revisited
Social Legal Studies, December 1, 2002; 11(4): 475 - 502.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Legal StudiesHome page
P. Gill
Policing and Regulation: Whatisthe Difference?
Social Legal Studies, December 1, 2002; 11(4): 523 - 546.
[Abstract] [PDF]