Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social & Legal Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lim, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

What Is This Thing About Female Circumcision? Legal Education and Human Rights

Kate Green

School of Law, University of East London, UK

Hilary Lim

School of Law, University of East London, UK

The article explores the construction of Female Circumcision as the epitome of the challenge of cultural pluralism to universal human rights within human rights peda gogy. Three particular features of this construction are investigated. First, the horror of the practice seems to render other challenges invisible. As a result, it appears that the west is the place of normality, and other peoples have instead 'culture and tra dition'. Second, it is sited in a mythical 'Africa', fixed as one place and one time, with one 'victim', which includes not only the 'passive child' but also the 'dangerous African seductress'. Third, the pedagogic construction implicitly relies on the notion of the west's rational and autonomous human being. Among the many possibilities for discussion here, the article focuses on the two most significant to the argument: the child and the body. The article concludes that the pedagogic construction of Female Circumcision undermines the whole enterprise of gaining a deeper under standing of cultural pluralism and universalism. Incorporating discussion of body practices common in the west, including male circumcision, equally presents the danger of creating simple 'objects of study'. A way forward is consciously to seek in the classroom the multilayered awareness which is necessary to recognize our own limitations.

Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 7, No. 3, 365-387 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/096466399800700303


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Social Legal StudiesHome page
D. Buss, R. Fletcher, D. Monk, S. Monro, and O. Phillips
Introduction to 'Sexual Movements and Gendered Boundaries: Legal Negotiations of the Global and the Local'
Social Legal Studies, March 1, 2005; 14(1): 5 - 15.
[PDF]