Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social & Legal Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schneiderman, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Constitutionalizing the Culture-Ideology of Consumerism

David Schneiderman

University of Alberta, Canada

This paper is an inquiry into the structuration of the culture-ideology of consumerism in the field of constitutional law. Consumerism is a strategy of transnational forces of production that inculcates the values of western consumer lifestyle on a global scale, a strategy used to good effect particularly by the producers of American cultural products. It is argued that domestic constitutional courts, such as the Supreme Court of Canada, are complicit in the process of advancing consumerism through their interpretations of the constitutional guarantee of freedom of expression. The paper begins with a discussion of state theory in order to better understand the role of state agencies, such as courts, in constraining and enabling particular sets of actors. The paper then moves through the debate, primarily within cultural studies, between structural-determining and agency-enabling accounts of consumerism. The Supreme Court of Canada's jurisprudence regarding freedom of expression is then canvassed and contrasted with the judicial record regarding secondary picketing in the context of consumer boycotts. The judicial approach to consumerism is revealed to be partial and strategically selective so as to favour expression that facilitates, rather than impedes, the forces of production.

Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 7, No. 2, 213-238 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/096466399800700204


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Marketing TheoryHome page
M. Tadajewski
Final thoughts on amnesia and marketing theory
Marketing Theory, December 1, 2008; 8(4): 465 - 484.
[Abstract] [PDF]