This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sin Wai Man Articles by Chu Yiu Wai Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Whose Rule of Law? Rethinking Post- Colonial Legal Culture in Hong Kong

Department of Law, City University of Hong Kong

Chu Yiu Wai

Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Hong Kong Baptist University

In postcolonial Hong Kong, the Rule of Law inherited from the colonizers has acquired the status of a grand narrative capable of masking its own injustices. This is made possible by the Occidentalization strategies employed by those in power, namely the government and the legal profession. The major injustice of the Rule of Law is in its construction of the standard of reasonableness. It is argued that for lin guistic, ethnic and structural reasons, reasonableness as construed in the legal dis course is culture-biased and marginalizes qing, which is a very important element of the cultural roots of the Hong Kong Chinese. The influence of this marginalization of qing is not limited to the legal discourse itself, but is further extended to the public sphere. In turn, in relation to the Rule of Law, the public sphere is rendered unable to perform the task of a 'warning system with sensors' as desired by Habermas.

Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 7, No. 2, 147-169 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/096466399800700201


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?