Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social & Legal Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bönisch-Brednich, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Politicizing the Past: Indigenous Scholarship and Crown—Maori Reparations Processes in New Zealand

Richard S. Hill

Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

Brigitte Bönisch-Brednich

Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

The historical injustices inflicted upon Maori by colonization are being addressed by the New Zealand state through reparations processes conducted under the Treaty of Waitangi of 1840. In this antipodean version of transitional justice, indigenous and western worldviews confront each other in fundamental ways. Methodologically, for example, `western' legal and historical scholars are faced with the challenge of an oral-based indigeneity whose goals transcend those of the reparations system. The resulting complex series of interactions are transacted differentially between disciplines. With the legal profession focusing on text, western historians on context and indigenous scholars on orality, problems abound. These are further complicated by the essentially political nature of `Treaty settlement' negotiations. But legal and historical disciplines are showing signs of flexible and innovative approaches to indigenous perspectives (and vice versa). And on a practical level, settlements are being signed. The ultimate test of `healing the past' in an increasingly bicultural country will be, however, whether the experiences of the Treaty reparations processes assist the parties to reach arrangements that meet the indigenous aspiration which dominates the history of Crown—Maori relations in New Zealand: the attainment of the rangatiratanga/autonomy promised in the Maori version of the second article of the Treaty.

Key Words: Maori • orality • pakeha • rangatiratanga/autonomy • race relations • reparations • transitional justice • Treaty of Waitangi

Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 16, No. 2, 163-181 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0964663907076525


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?